• Home
  • PC

    $200 AMD Ryzen 5 3600 OC’d Beats $484 Intel Core i9-9900K in Geekbench Single Core Test

    - Advertisement -

    We’ve been seeing a lot of Zen 2 benchmarks lately, with pretty much all of them decimating their Intel competitors. We saw the Ryzen 5 3600 beating the Core i7-9700K, the Ryzen 7 3800X surpassing the Core i9-9900K, and last but not the least, the 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X became the fastest processor on Geekbench. But, what if I told you that an overclocked Ryzen 5 3600 can humiliate the Core i9-9900K? That’s right a $199 Zen 2 chip goes up against Intel’s ($484) consumer flagship and comes out on top:

    Now, of course, terms and conditions apply. For starters, this benchmark was recorded on Linux where overclocking is easier and generally Geekbench scores are a bit higher, but not by this much. Sure, you can overclock a Core i9-9900K and get a notably higher score using LN2 and one of those expensive motherboards, but you are still looking at more than twice the investment for just the processor, plus the nitrogen cooling kit and a Z390 board. You can get a 3600 for just $200 plus an X470 motherboard should do just fine. Pair it with fast DDR4 memory and voila, you’ve got yourself a PC that beats an Intel system costing twice as much.

    - Advertisement -

    On top of this, the AMD setup has a default TDP rating of 65W while the Coffee Lake flagship draws 95W and is known to run hot. Furthermore, you’re also required to buy the heat-sink separately, so add another $35-50 (at the very least) to the blue setup. The Zen and Zen+ lineups might have been disruptive, forcing Intel to play nice, but the 7nm Zen 2 is aiming to bring it down.

    Further Reading:

    AMD Ryzen 3700X, The Best Overclocking Chip in Ryzen 3000 Series?


    - Advertisement -
    I love computer hardware and RPGs, and those two things are what drove me to start TechQuila. Other than that most of my time goes into reading psychology, writing (and reading) dark poetry and playing games. Lead Editor at Techquila and HardwareTimes.com

    Recent Articles

    Nvidia announces FY2020 Q3 Revenue of $3.01 billion

    Nvidia reported strong financial results in Q3 of the 2020 financial year, with $3.01 billion in revenue. This was driven by strong...

    Best Graphics Cards for Gaming in 2019: Your GPU Buying Guide

    With the coming of AMD's Navi lineup, NVIDIA's monopoly in the graphics card market has come to an end. Other than the...

    Best Gaming PC Build Under 80,000 for Playing at 1440p: November 2019

    These days, many people game at 1440p, and I'm not talking about 1440p 60 FPS, I'm talking about 100+ frame per sec...

    Best Gaming PC Build Under Rs. 45,000 for Playing PUBG and Fortnite at 1080p:...

    At present, the Battle Royale genre is one of the most popular among PC gamers worldwide. Over the past few years, Player...

    AMD Radeon RX 5500 to Cost Around $40-$50 More than NVIDIA’s GTX 1650

    AMD launched the Radeon RX 5500 a while back exclusively via OEMs and its partners and while the benchmarks shared by the...

    Related Stories


        • Right… I don’t think you understood the question. You’ve missed the point entirely. Where’s the proof for an overclocked CPU? We can only see the base frequency. I might call you a “retard” for not getting a simple question, but I don’t think that making such an obvious statement will make me feel any better. Feel free not to answer, is not as if I will expect something “illuminating” from you.

    Leave a Reply

    Stay on Top - Get the daily news in your inbox