AMD has been giving a hard time to Intel ever since their press conference at CES 2019 got over. They blessed the Gaming Industry with 3rd Gen Ryzen processors that crushed Intel’s flagship Core i9 not only in performance but power consumption as well.
Now AMD has just published a new video on their YouTube channel showcasing a comparison of the 64 Core 128 Thread EPYC “Rome” workstation CPU (no confirmation on the clock speed) up against two Intel Xeon 8180M processors, each having a mammoth 28 Cores, 56 Threads and clocked at 2.5GHz going upto 3.8GHz.
The comparison was done using the C-Ray benchmark which tests by rendering images. AMD’s test included rendering 3 images simultaneously at FullHD, QuadHD and 4k.
The Single AMD EPYC Rome processor ended up finishing the test at 28 seconds while the two Xeon processors took over 2 seconds finishing at 30.5 seconds.
Multiple OEMs/ODMs to Deny Support for AMD 7nm Mobility Lineup
Intel Core i9-9900T 35W Low Power CPU Listed Online
Compare between intrl or AMD
Which on better ?
Amd better than Intel
AMD growing very challengingly, finally Ryzen and Epyc processors became popular.
So a processor with an extra 6c/12t was 2 seconds faster! Wow intel is doomed!
Completely missed the point.
Single AMD 64C epic cca 5k$ beat 2 Intel 28C zeon’s 10k$ each
For 1/4 of the price and half of power draw you get better performance.
That’s impressive. Such value for so less money. Even though 5k isn’t less, but it isn’t meant for consumers.
Which Amd processor is equal or better than intel i7
well it depends on what generation of i7 you are looking at 🙂
But what about AMD’s low lavel processors like A series?